Difference between revisions of "Talk:ITLPviii Group Kotter"
(→How should we want to structure our collaboration space) |
(→How should we structure our collaboration space?) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===How should we structure our collaboration space?=== | ===How should we structure our collaboration space?=== | ||
| − | Jim has posted his thoughts about the article in a different space, and is posting broad discussion points in this space (great points, too, I think). We need both, for sure. | + | Jim has posted his thoughts about the article in a different space, and is posting broad discussion points in this space (great points, too, I think). We need both, for sure. But I think it would be helpful to have some mutual agreement on "how to collaborate". We've got so many tools at our disposal - including live, interactive ones! I'm thinking that maybe a group phone call might be a good way to sort of lay down some basic ideas and ground rules. (Of course that brings up the scheduling problem. And Jim recently discovered a great solution to that: doodle. I will set up a doodle "poll", and we can find a mutual time to talk by phone.) [[User:Lundberg|Lundberg]] 09:21, 3 May 2007 (PDT) |
| − | |||
| − | But I think it would be helpful to have some mutual agreement on "how to collaborate". We've got so many tools at our disposal - including live, interactive ones! I'm thinking that maybe a group phone call might be a good way to sort of lay down some basic ideas and ground rules. | ||
| − | |||
| − | (Of course that brings up the scheduling problem. And Jim recently discovered a great solution to that: doodle. I will set up a doodle "poll", and we can find a mutual time to talk by phone.) | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 3 May 2007
What is the Discussion Page all about?
We can use this as a sort of out-of-band area to discuss meta issues, without muddling up the article page.
How should we structure our collaboration space?
Jim has posted his thoughts about the article in a different space, and is posting broad discussion points in this space (great points, too, I think). We need both, for sure. But I think it would be helpful to have some mutual agreement on "how to collaborate". We've got so many tools at our disposal - including live, interactive ones! I'm thinking that maybe a group phone call might be a good way to sort of lay down some basic ideas and ground rules. (Of course that brings up the scheduling problem. And Jim recently discovered a great solution to that: doodle. I will set up a doodle "poll", and we can find a mutual time to talk by phone.) Lundberg 09:21, 3 May 2007 (PDT)
