Difference between revisions of "ClassInFocus"

From PublicWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 39: Line 39:
 
* Not readily available through the web like Connect (requires download, demo, install, ...)
 
* Not readily available through the web like Connect (requires download, demo, install, ...)
 
| Easy install, but company makes it heavy weight, and must have a license.
 
| Easy install, but company makes it heavy weight, and must have a license.
 +
 +
|-
 +
! Cisco's Webex
 +
|
 +
* Looks a lot like e/pop
 +
|
 +
* Seems expensive - not sure about video - more geared toward business meeting and sharing desktop apps
 +
|
 +
* I think so, not sure
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 49: Line 58:
 
* Not sure
 
* Not sure
  
|-
 
! Other multi-media conference platforms?
 
|
 
* Pros?
 
|
 
* Cons?
 
|
 
* Install?
 
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 23:08, 24 October 2008

Platform Pros Cons Install??
Adobe Connect [1]
  • Flash/Action script would be easy to prototype new ideas
  • Web-enabled, participants don't have to download anything, just go to a URL
  • Recording built in
  • New "break-outs" allow small group discussion
  • Seems like we may be able to create individual views because one person can pause the webcam of another without affecting the global view.
  • Limited individual student flexibility (all students and teacher see the same display)
  • Video quality is not as good as others - actually it's unintelligible.
  • Video capability when lots of people have webcams, not much flexibility to reshape/zoom/crop video feeds.

Nope, just need a flash player

MS Conference XP [2]
  • Individual flexibility, people can move and reshape windows to best suite needs
  • Video quality seems good, but that might be because I tried it out on a local dedicated server.
  • Requires dedicated server and network support
  • Requires installation and setup that are a little cumbersome
  • Requires powerful computer, if not video is terrible (worse than Connect!).

Yes, heavy weight installation required

e/pop [3]
  • Individual flexibility, people can move and reshape windows to best suite needs
  • Video quality really good
  • Overwhelming for older/less powerful computers
  • Expensive
  • Not readily available through the web like Connect (requires download, demo, install, ...)
Easy install, but company makes it heavy weight, and must have a license.
Cisco's Webex
  • Looks a lot like e/pop
  • Seems expensive - not sure about video - more geared toward business meeting and sharing desktop apps
  • I think so, not sure
Epresence
  • Open source version
  • Expensive service plan and hosting plan, not sure how that fits in with the open source stuff
  • Not sure