Difference between revisions of "UW Society and Technology Group RFID Position Paper"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The debate surrounding RFID is one that hits close to home for UW students. The CSE building is currently going through a large scale RFID deployment, foreshadowing what is to come in shops, offices, homes, and cities. In this whitepaper, we explore the broader practical, legal and sociopolitical implications of the technology. | The debate surrounding RFID is one that hits close to home for UW students. The CSE building is currently going through a large scale RFID deployment, foreshadowing what is to come in shops, offices, homes, and cities. In this whitepaper, we explore the broader practical, legal and sociopolitical implications of the technology. | ||
| − | + | We want you to be bold in making edits-- wiki software allows us to keep a complete history of all the text in this document, so we will never lose anything you change. This document will be in flux throughout the quarter. Nothing is sacred. Not text, formatting, or whitepaper organization. Change any aspect you think could be done better. Hopefully by the end of the quarter we will be able to tie up loose ends and have answers to most of the questions we've asked with multiple perspectives articulated by seminar participants. | |
== RFID overview == | == RFID overview == | ||
Revision as of 17:41, 30 September 2006
The debate surrounding RFID is one that hits close to home for UW students. The CSE building is currently going through a large scale RFID deployment, foreshadowing what is to come in shops, offices, homes, and cities. In this whitepaper, we explore the broader practical, legal and sociopolitical implications of the technology.
We want you to be bold in making edits-- wiki software allows us to keep a complete history of all the text in this document, so we will never lose anything you change. This document will be in flux throughout the quarter. Nothing is sacred. Not text, formatting, or whitepaper organization. Change any aspect you think could be done better. Hopefully by the end of the quarter we will be able to tie up loose ends and have answers to most of the questions we've asked with multiple perspectives articulated by seminar participants.
