Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chart research"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
(4) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_Description_Languages Architecture Description Language] Somewhat related, though I have not yet read their paper. | (4) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architecture_Description_Languages Architecture Description Language] Somewhat related, though I have not yet read their paper. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Join== | ||
| + | I don't know who Jack and Moriarty are, but I gather you're working with the architecture group. Just a note: to me Charts (once you get past the very curious syntax) looks a lot like a subset of the Join Calculus. [[User:Keunwoo|Keunwoo]] 16:08, 8 March 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 00:08, 9 March 2006
(1)Must the graph be acyclic? It doesn't seem like that is necessary. I believe that we are looking for reducible graphs. I don't exactly know yet what that all implies, but I do know that allows for certain types of cycles. --Jack 22:11, 10 December 2005 (PST)
(2)What other meta-models are we attempts to deal with besides computation? --Jack 22:11, 10 December 2005 (PST)
(2.1) Hmm. I don't think I meant it like that. I think I meant that it's not just about a certain architecture (as many paradigms try to imply). We are trying to come up with a computational model. This is why we are using a wiki. I will fix it.
(3) We should make a goals/challengs/ideas/restrictions/thoughts/worries page. (done)
(4) Architecture Description Language Somewhat related, though I have not yet read their paper.
Join
I don't know who Jack and Moriarty are, but I gather you're working with the architecture group. Just a note: to me Charts (once you get past the very curious syntax) looks a lot like a subset of the Join Calculus. Keunwoo 16:08, 8 March 2006 (PST)
