Difference between revisions of "Soctech seminar, Spring 2006"
(→Topics (with tentative dates)) |
(→Topics (with tentative dates)) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*'''9 May''' [[Privacy Rights in the US and Elsewhere]] | *'''9 May''' [[Privacy Rights in the US and Elsewhere]] | ||
− | *''' | + | *'''16 May''' [[Dissidents in China: Google, Freedom and Information]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*'''Search as Political Statement (23 May):''' [[Details]] Is the use of link structure to evaluate quality a democratizing force? Or does it reinforce the status quo? Are phenomena like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bombing Google Bombing] quirks or do they open up new avenues of serious political commentary? | *'''Search as Political Statement (23 May):''' [[Details]] Is the use of link structure to evaluate quality a democratizing force? Or does it reinforce the status quo? Are phenomena like [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bombing Google Bombing] quirks or do they open up new avenues of serious political commentary? |
Revision as of 05:09, 29 March 2006
Society and technology seminar: SLN 2932 CSE 590 T, Tue 12:30-1:20, CSE 403
(Law students should register for CSE 590 X - sln 2936, everything else is identical)
Spring 2006: The Social Ramifications of Search Technologies
As the cliché goes, in today’s “information society” there is no shortage of information, but rather an inability to process information in meaningful ways. The primary contemporary response to this information inundation has been the Search. As a consequence, the search engine has become one of the most important transformative social institutions of our time.
Because the heart of search is a mechanical ordering of results by relevance to a query, search algorithms are a new way of judging quality. This extends perhaps most importantly to the ranking of the quality of cultural content, something which in the past has been a human task. What does this mean for the distribution of power in society? How might the search algorithms themselves open up new avenues of political participation and expression? How might they work toward social exclusion?
Google in particular has been in the news recently for a variety of essential topics which demonstrate that search engines are raising many questions about the organization of content and access to it. And in the process, they are clashing with many different social institutions. With regard to privacy: should the US government have access to privately held information about the search habits of its citizens? With regard to political change and censorship: what role should search engines play in China in regards to dissidence and freedom of information? With regard to the current copyright institution: what content should be searchable?
In this seminar, we will explore a wide range of topics related to the search engine, drawing on sources as varied as current news stories, social science research, and algorithm design. Although we don't want to focus on Google, let's be honest, it will be difficult to not center on the company whose name, in our vernacular, has become synonomous with the verbs "to search" and "to discover".
Contact information: This course is being organized by Travis Kriplean (travis at cs) and David Orange (dborange at gmail).
If you would like to continue to receive news about ongoing soctech activities, then subscribe to the soctech@cs mailing list.
Contents
Topics (with tentative dates)
Suggestions are welcome about additional topics, improved organization, how to refine the existing topics, and relevant readings for each. Please send an email to travis (@cs) if you have such suggestions! Note that the readings will be pared down to be manageable for a seminar.
- 28 March Introduction and The Search Engine as a Social Institution
- Presented by Prof. Terry Brooks (i-School) - homepage
- Slides that Terry will speak against
- 18 April Strengths and Weaknesses of Search
- 25 April Fair Use of Content
- Presented by Prof. Dan Laster (Law) - homepage
- Search as Political Statement (23 May): Details Is the use of link structure to evaluate quality a democratizing force? Or does it reinforce the status quo? Are phenomena like Google Bombing quirks or do they open up new avenues of serious political commentary?
- Google Bombing article at wikipedia. Especially check out the scientology struggle.
- Philip Howard. 2003. Digitizing the Social Contract: Producing American Political Culture in the Age of New Media. The Communications Review v. 6. http://faculty.washington.edu/pnhoward/publishing/articles/socialcontract.pdf.
- Exclusion and Inclusion through Search (30 May): Details How do search algorithms work for or against social stratification? How does it affect our approach to cultural content? What are the implications of mechanical evaluations of quality?
- Lucas Introna and Helen Nissenbaum. 2000. Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters. The Information Society v. 16(3). http://www.indiana.edu/~tisj/readers/abstracts/16/16-3%20Introna.html
- Kieran Healy. 2002. Digital Technology and Cultural Goods. The Journal of Political Philosophy v. 10(4). http://www.kieranhealy.org/files/papers/jpp.pdf
- Other Possible Topics
- How other communication technologies (e.g. radio, TV, printing press) have transformed society in the past and how these transformations may be similar or different to the ones we're seeing with search.
- Money continues to play a large role in political communications. Is the role amplified by search, and how has it changed. Should we be concerned?
- Is the internet becoming mature enough that it ought to be regulated? If we, for instance, give certain data priority, how should speech be treated?
- Other Resources
- John Battelle. The Search. 2005. New York, Portfolio Hardcover.
- Eszter Hargittai. 2000. Radio’s Lessons for the Internet. Communications of the ACM v. 43(1). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=323830.323844.
Mailing list
Visit
to sign up for the course mailing list. You will need a UW NetID. Contact Keunwoo if you have any difficulty signing up.
Administrative info
Course grading and credit-load policies: Subject to change, but variable credits are available to meet differing levels of participation:
- Sign up for 1 credit if you plan to attend, do the readings, and participate in discussions.
- Sign up for 2 credits if you wish to lead a discussion/present OR write a paper (four pages).
- Sign up for 3 credits if you wish to lead a discussion/present AND write two short papers (four pages each) (Note: you must contact the course organizers in advance if you plan to take this course for 3 credits.)
Past seminars
Other Relevant Class Pages
- Fall 2005 CSE522 http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/cse522/CurrentQtr/