ConferencingResearch
From PublicWiki
Revision as of 02:08, 11 March 2009 by AnnaCavender (talk | contribs) (Created page with '[http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1460000/1459431/p539-junuzovic.pdf?key1=1459431&key2=9814376321&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=26174391&CFTOKEN=74063806] Sasa Junuzovic, Rajesh Hegde,...')
[1] Sasa Junuzovic, Rajesh Hegde, Zhengyou Zhang, Philip A. Chou, Zicheng Liu, Cha Zhang. Requirements and Recommendations for an Enhanced Meeting Viewing Experience. ACM international conference on Multimedia 29 Oct. 2008
Comments: Compared a 2D and 3D interface for conferencing video windows. Participants could configure, place, and zoom windows. Knowing who is speaking in a meeting is important. Automatically rearranging windows to signify importance is disorienting. 2D did better for seeing participant's faces. 3D is better for knowing where participants are looking. 3D not important for seeing transitions.
